Advocacy for Patent Attorneys
CPD Training provides advocacy courses for Patent Attorneys, from general public speaking training to Higher Rights of Audience. Several major patent firms have hired us to train their practitioners.
“Peter Lyons has a wealth of knowledge and anecdotes which he willingly shares with the course participants, thereby making the whole experience fun and enjoyable. At the same time, attorneys at all levels benefitted from the challenging scenarios presented to them and went away better advocates. I would happily recommend this course to others.”
Richard Jackson / Managing Partner, Carpmaels & Ransford
“The course was excellent. I have already done 2 courses on advocacy. This was better- structured, focussed, involved immediate feedback and constructive criticism.”
“The fact that the content was not IP focussed really helped with the task at hand: to learn advocacy.”
The teaching was also excellent. There were excellent materials and [it was delivered] at a perfect pace and a [good] ratio of teaching to hands-on practice. It was the best constructive criticism I have received in a while. It was challenging and confidence boosting. Fun!”
Dr Lara Elder / Senior Associate, Carpmael’s & Ransford LLP
Public speaking and presentation skills
Our confidence-building courses focus on making you an effective presenter. We concentrate on improving the content of your presentations as well as giving you suggestions on your delivery. Each time you perform, you will receive a positive but fair critique from a very experienced trainer. If you wish, we will video your performance and play it back to you in a private session.
Appearing before patent tribunals
This course is designed to bring out your best persuasive qualities before patent tribunals. It covers the organisation of your materials; the structure of your submissions and how you deal with your opponent. It also concentrates on how to best handle the tribunal’s questions. Finally, we give you sensible suggestions on how to persuade a tribunal.
Interim advocacy performs a vital function under the Civil Procedure Rules. It assists the court in defining and narrowing the issues, encouraging the parties to co-operate with each other and often making it less likely that a case will go to trial.
Some cases are not easy. Applications for summary judgment, strike-out and specific disclosure can present quite complex questions and there is often little time to persuade a court. The courts' resources are limited. The judges who hear interim applications - usually Masters and District Judges - are busy and pressed for time. The best advocates are usually the best organised. The challenge for the advocate in an interim application is "how can you be simple, succinct and persuasive and still assist the judge in getting the decision you want?"
This course achieves all those things by asking you to play the advocate in realistic situations and giving you positive and helpful critiques on your performance.
Higher Rights of Audience
If you hold the Higher Courts Litigation Certificate under the IPReg rules, you may do our 2-day course on advocacy which leads to an assessment approved by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. If you pass the assessment you may apply to IPReg to be granted the Higher Courts Advocacy Certificate with rights to appear as an advocate in intellectual property cases in the High Court and above. This is a qualification which would appeal to your clients but it is also a very good part of your professional development. Several leading patent attorneys have already passed our assessment.
For more information on Higher Rights of audience click here.
Patent Attorneys Choose Higher Rights - September 2013
England’s patent attorneys have taken up the opportunity to improve their advocacy skills by signing up to CPD Training’s highly-regarded programme.
Keith Beresford described the course as "truly excellent and stimulating" and Timothy Powell, a partner at Potter Clarkson LLP said "The content [of the course] takes you through highly practical exercises to a state of experience in previously unfamiliar areas of practice".
Mr Powell, who has 27 years of experience, described the quality of the teaching as excellent. "Peter Lyons is a consummate tutor", he said. "He teaches clearly and with subtlety; and he endlessly observes the delegates. He adjusts the course according to the delegate’s progress".
George Whitten, Vice President at Qualcomm Europe Inc, said the course was excellent because it was very interactive. The trainer had been friendly, open and informative.
Richard Hart from Infineum UK Ltd agreed. He said the course and the teaching had been "thought-provoking, fast-paced, targeted and well prepared".
Robert Jehan of Williams Powell said the trainer was excellent. "He was firm, explains well and has endless energy".
Barbara Cookson from Filemot Technology Law Ltd who has been practising for 21 years praised the interactivity of the training and said the feedback was positive. "No candidate was unduly criticised" she said.